Restricting College Tuition Rates - 1241 Words

Restricting College Tuition Rates Emily A. Fickes Maranatha Baptist University The Government Must Restrict College Tuition Rates In America over the past decade, college tuition prices have gone through the roof. Many Americans today suffer with incredibly high debt, or they fear that they will not be able to pay off their debt, resulting in fewer people wanting to continue their education. Without citizens getting a higher education, America would be uneducated, which would result in America becoming neurologically nullified. Sarah Amandalore (2014), writer for the Los Angeles Times states in her article â€Å"The student loan crisis: How middle-class kids get hammered†, ‘The Delta Cost Project’ at American Institutes for Research examined rising college costs and concluded that, in recent years, a combination of state funding cuts, overspending by research universities and decreased donations have led to tuition spikes at both public and private schools† (pg. 1). When lower-income families are faced with these problems, it makes getting a higher education hard to reach. With a highe r education, more life and job opportunities become available. By the government putting a limit on the amount colleges could raise their tuition, more people may opt to get a higher education. The fear of being in debt makes the idea of a higher education less valuable to many people. The government should restrict the tuition amount chargedShow MoreRelatedIncreasing Tuition Costs For College1624 Words   |  7 Pages â€Æ' Increasing Tuition Costs College degrees are becoming ever more a standard in my industries, just to get into the door with certain companies. Even when degrees might not be required to get a decent job, marketing can take over and make you think that you need to get a college degree or you won’t land that dream job. Brill states that on the average, we are continually reminded, the earnings of college graduates are substantially higher than those who have obtained no more than a high schoolRead MoreThe Future Of Higher Education1670 Words   |  7 Pageswill be the researcher’s predictions for the following: 1. Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) 2. Accessibility 3. Tenure 4. Sexual Assault on College Campuses 5. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 6. Student Loan Debt 7. Alcohol Abuse in Greek Organization 8. State Appropriations 9. Undocumented Immigration 10. Suicide among university and college students This researcher will state a prediction regarding each issue addressed, and provide citations of verification from other researchersRead MoreThe Vicious Cycle Of Student Loans1576 Words   |  7 Pagesdollars and are still on going. It would take the United States hundred-fifty years, twenty million dollars a day to fully cover this national debt. Student loans are intended for students to go to college but they come with a rising social and economic cost. As the expectancy of high return and tuition are increasing, more students are ending up with a mountain of debt and without a degree. It is risking our countries’ future; we will face another recession if the trend of student loans continuesRead MoreWhy Students Should Not Be A College Education Essay1280 Words   |  6 Pages â€Å"I went to college because it was what I thought I was supposed to do†, is something that is often heard from students when they are asked why they went to college. Society has predefine d a direction in life for human beings that is believed to be the mantra for success. A student typically goes from high school to a college and further after college takes up a job. It hardly comes as a surprise as to why students fail to attach a reason to pursue a college education, as every student is expectedRead MoreThe Rise Of College Tuition2217 Words   |  9 PagesProposed topic: The Rise of College Tuition, Our Freedom of Choice and Fairness. Introduction: College rising tuition is currently the hottest topics debated by political and social interest’s groups who pretty much understand that if this is not fixed soon, it will have long damaging effects on our convalescent economy. It is important to be reminded that college education play a tremendous multiplier role in our economy that holds more the 50% of college graduates. (College Has Been Oversold by AlexRead MoreShould College Athletes Be Paid?1739 Words   |  7 PagesCollege entertainment has become more widely known in today’s society. College athletes these days are bigger and stronger than there were in the past. Knowing a former athlete one might say that most people do not realize the pressure and stress college athletes face every day. College athletes, being the size they are today, make a more high risk of injury. They play a great role in university revenues depending on their performance. Sports also play a great role in our economy such as theRead MoreIs College Really Worth It?967 Words   |  4 PagesSo, Is college really worth it? About a generation ago getting a college education was born out of the pursuit of knowledge, but now it has become a competition for students to get into the most accredited University right after they are handed their high school diploma. College tuition has become so expensive in the last ten years that people are now debating whether or not college it is worth pursuing right out of high school. A college education is what the student makes out of it, and if theyRead MoreThe Issue Of The Student Loan Crisis1762 Words   |  8 Pagesaverage college graduate owes thirty-seven thousand dollars in loans (Glum). As a whole, Americans owe a grand total of 1.3 trillion dollars. These are figures that grow every year, and worse, the number of people who are defaulting on their payments grows as well. The issue of the student loan crisis is serious, which is why potential solutions are now being discussed. Presidential candidates for the election of 2016 have discussed solutions that range from Hillary Clinton’s debt-free college planRead MoreCollege Athletes Are Being Consumed By The World Of College Athletics1468 Words   |  6 PagesAmericans have become consumed by the world of college athletics. This excitement can be seen all around us. Here at the University of Florida, we experience the energy of division I college sports every day. Whether we choose to participate on football game days, wear Gator athletic apparel, or make conversation every day revolving around topics such as â€Å"Tebow’s non-existent NFL career† or â€Å"that one basketball player that kept us out of the championship†, the star athletes of our universities becomeRead MoreHuman Resource Practices With Business Goals1363 Words   |  6 Pagesbusiness environment innovation is key to the success of a company. This is why it is important when aligning business goals to factor in a well round compensation system. For example, in my experience a well-rounded plan t hat contain benefits such as tuition reimbursement tends to keep high quality employees around because it show that the company value development. For one thing, such a plan leads to increased cost for a company which can start to cut into profitability. Nonetheless, the exceptional

Analysis Perspectives On Sustainability - 1492 Words

Introduction The living standards in 2015 compared to one hundred years ago have changed immensely, from the size of houses, energy consumption, the necessary access to treated water. Higher standards of living have made way for higher and denser populations. Additionally, the impact on the environment has increased simultaneously with the growth of our wants and needs. This reflective essay will cover themes introduced and focused on throughout the course â€Å"Perspectives on Sustainability†, which addresses multiple aspects of how to live sustainably, how to reduce the negative impact on the environment and to create a shift in people s outlook regarding sustainability. The overall idea promoted in the course was the need for increased†¦show more content†¦In the guest lecture about food systems, there were multiple costs mentioned regarding â€Å"more oil dependant large scale farms producing huge amounts of one thing, which over-saturate local markets, secondly the emissions let out by the transportation of these foods† (Koch, March 12, 2015) The environment, or nature, and human interaction was a common theme found periodically if not centred on for each chapter, lecture and guest speaker, as it is a major player in the game of sustainability, it is the ground for human activity. As discussed in one of the first lectures, â€Å"realize that humans are not outside of nature, we are still a part of the cycle† (Latta, January 6, 2015). A guest lecture by Luisa Ramirez discussed â€Å"The Complexity of Conservation Approaches† and spoke about how the paradigm has changed, â€Å"humans should be outside of nature, it could be set aside with no interaction† (Ramirez, March, 2015). Nature is and was a major focus, and the realization that humans are directly related to it should be reinstalled into our shared consciousness. Community was one of the most common themes in the course, and it was discussed by a majority of the guest speakers. The community refers to society as a whole, to local communities or even to a street of people who band together for change, any relation to a group of people with

Creating Spiritual and Psychological Resilience Anger Management

Question: Describe about the Creating Spiritual and Psychological Resilience Anger Management? Answer: In which 2 ways can anger be characterized? Anger can be characterized in two ways as Sinful- Commented Avtgis and Rancer (2010) sinful is a type of anger which should be avoided. If a person expresses sinful anger type he or she may lose the control. This later on can affect its life or work. As commented by Bhave and Saini (2009) sinful type of anger can be expressed by one in close place. So that no one gets hurt by it. Freeing- As stated by Black (2011) freeing is a type of anger which should be expressed by one. Non expression of anger can harm human being body. Everyone has right to express their feelings and emotion, but in a correct way. So that no one get hurt from their activity. What often occurs when a person is in possession of the facts regarding anger? Commented Avtgis and Rancer (2010) when a person is in control of facts regarding their angry, they do not know what they are speaking. The activities which they are performing can harm them, but they are unknown to it. As stated by Brenner, Bush and Moses (2010) angry can harm person in positive and negative way. If any leader is showing angry on their juniors, there is a chance of improvement in their performance Brenner, Bush and Moses (2010). This is a positive side of anger. On the other hand, employees can be de motivated also if leader shows anger in unethical manner Breathing Earth, venting cracks (2013) In addition to this Davis (2012) commented, anger is not just a feeling of human being but a method by which they express their feeling in front of others. Every human being is having anger feeling, but they show in different ways. What can non- expression of anger lead to? As commented by Goodwin (2011), non expression of anger leads to various heart and physiological diseases. One of the major diseases is coronary heart disease. If person is unable in expressing their anger, they may suffer from heart blockage or other heart related problem. Stated Brenner, Bush and Moses (2010) coronary heart disease may block flow of blood form heart to other body part. This may result in severe heart stoke. In addition to this Davis (2012) stated, if leader is not expressing his or her anger to employee. Then after some days leader will get frustrated or irritated regarding work and co workers Goodwin (2011). This irritation or frustration later on can harm business activities of his or her. It was found by Goodwin (2011) in a research, that people who do not express their anger feeling get separated from others. As they do not like they company which later on increase anger level. Expressing anger feeling or emotion in an ethical manner will not harm others Davis . (2012). But if expressed in unethical or aggressive manner will hurt others. What is catharsis? As commented by Holbrow (2013) catharsis is a process of purification of one emotions and feelings. In addition to this () stated, anger is the best to purify their emotions and feelings. Anger if expressed in ethical and proper way, can help human being in purifying their emotions and feelings. In addition to this Holbrow (2013) stated, to live a proper life emotions and feeling should always be pure regarding others. It will help person to work as a group in workplace or in personal life. Suppose a there are two friends among them one is very aggressive and other is opposite to it World Pumps (2011). To continue their friendship for long duration, feeling and emotions should be pure and clear. Commented Krueger (2009) every relationship essential factor is pure and clear feelings. Where do we tend to direct most of our anger? As commented by Avtgis and Rancer (2010) most people direct their anger by two ways constructive aggressiveness or venting aggressiveness. Constructive aggressive help one in expressing their anger in control way, so that no one get hurt. But in case of venting aggressiveness people harm other mentally or physically Quill (2009). They start beating or scolding unnecessarily other people to get relief from their anger stage. This activity of them shows their psychological level disturbance. In contrast to this Bhave and Saini (2009) stated, expressing anger in constructive manner help in maintaining the code of ethics in society. Anger should be expressed to reduce the risk of heart and psychological disease Brenner, Bush and Moses (2010). Suppose there is a group of five employees with two team lead Goodwin (2011). All employees initially were performing well. But later now the performance level of decreased which increased their team lead anger level. So in this case, if team lead s how venting aggressive form of anger employees will be de motivated Goodwin (2011). But if they control their anger and talk calmly with their employees it will affect in positive manner. As stated by Krueger (2009) anger help in solving conflicts whether it was workplace or related to personal life. Anger expression techniques differ person to person. In addition to this Quill (2009) stated, constructive aggressiveness form of anger expression help in positive way. Is it possible to express angry feelings without hurting the other person? Yes, it is possible to express anger without hurting any person. Anger is one best way to express their feelings but in an ethical way. As commented by Goodwin (2011) hurting someone is not the only way of expressing anger feeling or emotion. Angry feeling can be expressed in verbal words without hurting other person Holbrow (2013). It is not necessary to express anger by beating or abusing someone, it can be expressed by control words and acts. Commented Krueger (2009) anger feeling is one of the form by which one express its feeling and emotions in front of others. But it should always be in controlled way so that no one gets hurt from it. If assertion fails to gain a person what he is seeking, what then occurs? If assertion fails to gain a person what one is seeking for, anger can be defused again. In this case, anger can be in context to himself. As stated by Peel (2013), if person is unable to attain what they want regarding career, education, food and etc. They may get anger toward themselves and harm them by their act. Suppose there is a team of ten people and they are unable to achieve their task in given deadline Krueger (2009). The anger level will be high till they achieve their task. If a person is unable in achieving goal or objective in workplace or personal life, they will suffer from anger feeling and emotions. What is seen as being an important part of constructive anger expression? The important part of constructive anger expression is that one holds the responsibility towards its own feelings. In case of constructive ager expression, person feeling is to be controlled by them only. As commented by Peel (2013) person is responsible for controlling their own feeling and emotions are stage of anger. Constructive anger expression is best method used for expressing anger feeling. Stated Quill (2009) anger expression should never mentally or physically hurt others. Why is venting aggressive through aggressive acts not constructive? Commented Quill (2009) venting aggressive through aggressive acts like hitting or beating is not constructive. Constructive acts are those which never harm anyone physically or mentally Goodwin (2011). Every human being should have control on their feeling and emotions. As stated by Brenner, Bush and Moses (2010) if a person in anger stage harms other it is sign of psychological disturbance. No one is having right to harm other. In addition to this Bhave and Saini (2009) commented, there are few people who think that, anger feeling can only expressed by physical or mental aggressiveness. Venting aggressive form is the worst form of expressing ones anger feeling. Stated Avtgis and Rancer (2010) constructive aggressive helps to express in control way with no violence act. How is emotional relief from anger gained? As stated by Avtgis and Rancer (2010) emotional relief from anger gained can only be achieved after expressing it. Suppose manger of any company is suffering from anger regarding workplace environment. Once manager expresses his feeling in front of top management he will not get relief. In addition to this Bhave and Saini (2009) stated, in anger stage emotion relief can only be achieved after expressing or completing the resolution. It was found in a research by Goodwin (2011), people who express their anger live more happily and proper life in comparison of, people who do not express their anger. In workplace expressing anger help in solving conflicts which help in improving performance. Expressing feeling and emotions in front of others are very important. As stated by Avtgis and Rancer (2010), expressing feelings help in releasing bad thoughts and view which disturb mind. References Avtgis, T. and Rancer, A. (2010). Arguments, aggression, and conflict. New York: Routledge. Bhave, S. and Saini, S. (2009). Anger management. New Delhi: SAGE Publications. Black, A. (2011). Catharsis. [S.l.: CreateSpace]. Breathing Earth, venting cracks. (2013). Physics Today. Brenner, G., Bush, D. and Moses, J. (2010). Creating spiritual and psychological resilience. New York: Routledge. Davis, R. (2012). Catharsis. [S.l.]: Authorhouse. Goodwin, G. (2011). Symptom relief and facilitation of emotional processing. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 21, pp.S710-S715. Heat transfer pump with venting device. (2011). World Pumps, 2011(10), p.4. Holbrow, P. (2013). Dust explosion venting of small vessels and flameless venting. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 91(3), pp.183-190. Krueger, L. (2009). Anger management. Detroit: Greenhaven Press. Peel, M. (2013). Catharsis. [S.l.]: Authorhouse. Quill, C. (2009). Anger and anger management. New York: Rosen Pub. Group.

Perspective of FBI Vs Apple Case in Virtue Ethics Theory

Question: Write a research essay describing an ethical theory (deontology, virtue or Utilitarianism) or ethical issue we have discussed in this course.Also apply the FREE MARKET ETHIC to it and to critically review it using an ETHIC OF CARE. Describe the theory and its foundations in moral and ethical philosophy. Analyze its application in the 21st century business world and global marketplace, using examples from your research. Evaluate the theory and give your opinion as to whether it is a valid method of ethical decision-making in the workplace, identifying specific ethical dilemmas you see. Explain how the theory will shape the managerial role and responsibilities in an organization and its potential effect on ethical culture. Your goal is to make an argument and support it with a clear, original, and thorough analysis of the themes, arguments, and information presented in course readings and lectures. Your work will be evaluated by the specificity with which it answers the prompt, the cl arity of its thesis, the cohesiveness of its argument, and the extent to which it demonstrates a clear understanding of the central content, critical ideas, and key themes of the course. Answer: The Virtue Ethics Theory The virtue ethics theory tends to focus on the individual carrying out a particular action to try, and establish whether the person is acting morally/ethically or not. While the consequences of the individuals action and the rules governing the actions might be important to consider, the virtue ethics theory tends to de-emphasize them. More particularly, the primary factor remains whether the particular individual involved in the action has expressed a good character or not (Crisp, 2010). Good character in this case is shaped by the moral virtues that are defined by the virtue theorists. There are different descriptions of moral virtues according to the virtue ethics theory. First, moral virtues include admirable behaviors that bring about social harmony. Secondly, the moral virtues consist of dispositions within individuals that enable them to act according to reason. Therefore, the use of logic is critical in terms of determining the inclination of ones moral position ((Crisp, 2010). One can only be considered morally virtuous if they engage proper reasoning where in their actions, there can be proof of moderation rather than extremism. Thirdly, the virtue ethics theory emphasizes that moral virtues enable individuals to have the correct intention and to feel appropriate while carrying out various activities. Foundations of the Virtue Ethics Theory in Moral Ethical Philosophy The virtue theory is well founded in the moral and ethical philosophy advanced by Aristotle and Plato. The virtue theory is deeply founded on the views of Plato and Aristotle regarding morality and good character. Despite the fact that each of the two philosophers provided his own list of moral values, all of them sum up to the contemporary explanation of the virtue ethics theory. Thus, the aspect of virtue emerged from the two Greek philosophers, came up with a collection of several normative ethical philosophies which put an emphasis on being, and not on the actions. In founding the theory, Aristotle believed that the moral values/virtues safeguards human relations including friendship and without them, an individual cannot realize happiness (Kupperman, 2009). On the other hand, Plato believed that being virtuous is a course that one must pursue to attain it. In Platos Republic, the four cardinal virtues brought out include wisdom, temperance, fortitude, and justice. Therefore, for one to be considered virtuous, they must act in line with these cardinal virtues, which of course include other related moral values. Socrates who also contributed to the discussion on virtues stipulated that there exist only one virtue-knowledge. Therefore, one needs to have to a particular knowledge that can enable them know how to act in particular situations in an ethical way. Aristotle on the other hand divided virtues into moral virtues and intellectual virtues. These moral virtues are all means of given corresponding vices while the intellectual virtues consist of an individuals mental skills that enable them reach for truth and thus agreeing or disagreeing with something. Thus, the virtue ethics theory embraced today in different fields can be said to have originated from the works of early Greek philosophers and later shaped by the emergence of critics , situations and the wider need for its applications. Free Market Ethic the Virtue Ethics Theory in the FBI vs. Apple Case Free market involves the buying, the production, sale, and exchange of goods and services by an individual or entity without being interfered with by either a government or private institution. When every individual in the market possesses this particular freedom, then the market can be said to be free. Thus, each transaction in a free market is voluntary and based on buyer-seller agreement. People purchase goods and pay for them willingly at particular rates without being coerced and this consists of the free market ethic. The aspects of free market can be explained in relation to the virtue ethics theory. The virtue ethics theory emphasizes the need for people to embrace moral virtues including for instance justice, trust, and fortitude among others. While critics of the free market indicate that an individual may sell unscrupulous products in order to gain mammoth profits, it is clear that as long as the buyers have accepted these products and the terms involved then there is moral equality. Supporters of the free market aspects argue that moral equality does not mainly consist of the equal right to the produced good within the economy (Friedman, 2008). Moral equality instead involves the equal right for individuals to be free from being coerced by others. Any interference in the free market is unnecessary and even wasteful to all the parties playing within the economy. Governments are not welcome to interfere with the free market but instead may just need to provide a better platform for businesses to thrive. Interfering with issues regarding agreements between sellers and buyers can be one way of breaching moral equality. Business contract that have been entered into by a seller and a buyer need to remain safeguarded and terms adhered with in the spirit of practicing moral equality. The FBI vs. Apple case regarding a tussle where the earlier party wanted to obtain a terrorists iPhone information access after the Malibu attack that saw 14 people killed can be explained in the perspective of free market ethics theory. As indicated earlier, the free market ethic supports the view that there should be completely no interference in the market for all players. The government as an entity in this case, does not have the mandate to coerce the Apple Company through whatever legal means to provide software that will see the terrorists phone unlocked (Cuijpers, van Schendel, 2016). The free market ethic emphasizes the agreement between the buyer-the terrorists, and the seller of the IPhone. In free market economies, as long as there is a willing buyer of goods and services and/or a willing seller of the same, then a contract is sealed and must be honored. The Apple Company has a duty in its operation to safeguard the privacy of its customers, being a willing seller (Fried man, 2008). Since the buyers of the Apple IPhones usually chose it because of ensured information privacy, the company is compelled to ensure that their information is protected. Tim Cook the CEO of the Apple Company in fact indicated that the security features of the Apple iphone is one of the aspects that make their phones and other gadgets to sell in the current competitive technological markets. He further indicated that providing software that would unlock the IPhone risked the privacy of many other owners of similar gadgets. This is because the FBI can then use the software to gain access to private information on other Apple customers phones. Therefore in line with the free market ethic, the decision by the Apple company to refuse to develop the unlock software to the FBI was agreeable (Friedman, 2008). If we go by the free market ethic, then the government should completely not try to interfere with the contract entered into by the terrorist-iphone purchaser. The government later dropped its request to have Apple company device the unlock software to the IPhone indicating that the FBI had found a third party that assisted to unlock the phone. The Israeli Cellebrite Tech Company has been linked with this assistance, a move that has made the Apple company discouraged (Cuijpers, van Schendel, 2016). While Apple was out to protect their contract terms with the iphone purchaser as a willing buyer, it was against the free market ethic for the Cellebrite Company to interfere with this deal. The Israeli company that assisted in the unlocking of the phone becomes a third party and mainly interference in the free market assumptions. The above conclusion on the FBI vs. Apple case when viewed under the free market ethic can be analyzed in line with the virtue ethics theory. According to Plato, a republic needed to consist of four cardinal virtues, which include wisdom, temperance, fortitude, and justice. A virtuous individuals or entity must act in line with these cardinal virtues among other moral values (Cuijpers, van Schendel, 2016). Aristotle on the other hand stipulated that intellectual virtues are an individuals mental skills that enable them reach for truth and thus agreeing or disagreeing with something. In the case of the FBI vs. Apple, it is clear that the major ethical issue include a conflict between security and privacy. Security and privacy are both moral values, which must prevail within a given democratic society (Cuijpers, van Schendel, 2016). Considering natural justice as envisaged in the virtue ethics theory, it is clear that killing people is a vice. Killers are considered extremists in the society and they act beyond the mean behavior expected. Aristotle who supported the virtue ethics theory believed that a persons actions needed to be moderated. Terrorism needs to be eliminated in order for the society to live harmoniously. In this case, the free market ethic tends to protect terrorists who led to the death of 14 people in Malibu and might probably be planning other attacks. It becomes a dilemma when one needs to choose to protect their safety at the expense of their privacy and vice versa. In most cases that involve the need to choose between the two, many people and entities have preferred to sacrifice their privacy to security (Cuijpers, van Schendel, 2016). This shows the use of intellectual morals that enable people to choose between wrong and right. According to Socrates, knowledge is the main virtue as it helps people and entities to know between wrong and right, which is a similar case here. The virtue ethics would agree with the government to access the terrorists information in order to understand first whether the owner was involved. Once this was known, there was there could be a just decision on whether to pursue the IPhone owner for charges or not. Even so, a free market theorist would argue that government interference is never welcome in such a case. This case presents a tussle between those who believe in the free market ethic and those that believe in virtue ethics (Friedman, 2008). The Apple Company takes the free market ethic as a tool to defend itself while the government through the FBI and the courts tends to consider the virtue ethics their ultimate tool. Virtue theory the Ethic of Care in FBI vs. Apple Case The ethic of care theory as advanced by Carol Gilligan can be used to explain the case between the FBI vs. Apple Company. The ethic of care theory stresses that everyone needs to have a voice to be listened to not only carefully but also with respect (McPherson 2012). It also emphasizes the natural human relationships and interdependence indicating that individuals need each other whatsoever. The theory calls upon individuals to be responsive in their relationships with each other by paying attention, responding and carefully listening to others. It also indicates that people should be aware of the probability of losing connection with others or even with oneself in case there is no proper/ethical care (Engster, 2013). While the virtue ethics theory focuses on moral virtues, the care ethics emphasizes that morality originates from human relationships and bring about issues related to injustice and carelessness. There are differences between the two theories. The virtue ethics embraces the need for justice for all unlike the ethics of care that tends to consider a need-centered approach. In the case of the FBI vs. Apple, the company considers its relationship with its customers to be crucial and one that needs safeguarding. While it does not support terrorism, the Apple Company would not only like to protect its clients information on the IPhone acquired by the FBI, but also wants to do so, for millions of its loyal customers. The company feels compassionate and caring to its customers but this view contravenes the virtue ethics. The security of the masses should be considered more imperative than the privacy of an individual and/or a group. Considering this, the ethic of care should not have been considered in this case but instead, the Apple Company should have looked for software that only unlocks the terrorists IPhone. This encryption unlock software should be made in a way that it still could not be used by the FBI to reach for any other phone purchased by innocent civilians. This could be a just move, as it will end up tracking down terrorist activity while at the same time maintaining the safety and privacy of the IPhone buyers. Thus, there was no need for the Apple company to seem to be compassionate and to show a feeling of care for individuals who led to the death of 14 people in Malibu. Applications of the Virtue Theory in the 21st Century Business World The moral virtues outlined under the virtue ethics theory are today applied in the business world. For these virtues to be applied successfully to any business, the particular business and activities carried out must be considered as a practice (Wittmer OBrien, 2014). First, the virtue ethics theory today is also used in developing professional codes of ethics for different institutions. Every profession in the business world must have a code of ethics to follow. As a result, legal institutions including courts are entitled to use the codes of ethics where they are faced with cases involving unethical practices (Wittmer OBrien, 2014). Both local and international laws on professional ethics are developed and agreed upon by all related entities. In fact, Constitutional Acts can define the code of ethics for a given profession and thus making it legally binding for not only businesses but also for the employees working within the relevant establishments. Further, virtue ethics theory is used in labour relations and movements being entities that are normally affected by any interference with employee rights. These rights in one way can be considered as safeguards to moral rights as long as they provide justice to both the employees and the employers. While virtue ethics theory calls upon the employees to act morally, the employers are also put to task to ensure that they do not bring unnecessary barriers in the event that employees are seeking for justice (Moore, 2012). In terms of offering goods into the market, virtue ethics have been relied upon in deciding that there is need to offer quality goods and services. Fraudulent deals in the market where sellers defraud buyers and vice versa are discouraged under moral standings. Today, the business and contract laws that govern mutual agreements among different parties embrace the aspect virtue ethics in expecting utmost good faith among these parties. Industries that are allowed to exi st within a given surrounding are required to ethically oblige to conserving the environment and providing some crucial services to the communities within (Moore, 2012). Therefore, the virtue of ethics theory is a crucial element in the 21st Century business world, used in solving several ethical dilemmas that emerge within the business environment repeatedly. Evaluation and Validation The virtue ethics theory is a valid approach in ethical decision-making in any given workplace. This is because it provides the values that need to be embraced within a workplace and defines the professional behavior that people should assume. In the workplace, moral virtues do not only bring about harmony among the workers but also a peaceful relationship between them and their employers (Blumenthal-Barby, 2015). Shareholders, customers, suppliers and even the government rely heavily on the set of business ethics within and beyond a business premises. This is because once these moral virtues are practiced by every party, there is a high likelihood that there will be less harm in transactions and instead business deals will be legitimate (McPherson, 2012). The virtue ethics theory is thus a valid theory as it moral equality prevents corruption and ensures that everything is carried out under the law of natural justice (Blumenthal-Barby, 2015. Its emphasis on prudence, fortitude, and justice among other intellectual moral virtues make this theory a valid alternative to deontology and utilitarianism. Ways in which Virtue Ethics Shape Managerial Roles Responsibilities Virtue ethics shape ones managerial roles and responsibilities in different ways. First, virtue ethics envisaged in a company/industrial code of ethics oblige managers to carry out their duties in ethical manners. Having been considered trustees within the institution, the managers may need to avoid corruption in their offices, treat their workers fairly and professionally, and conduct themselves morally (West, 2016). Therefore, virtue ethics provides a path to follow for a manager who wants to be successful in their work. Secondly, compliance to company and industrial regulations is an ethical requirement. Managers who for instance evade paying taxes can be termed as unethical. Therefore, managers are responsible for ensuring that their companies comply to both internal and external regulations that safeguard well being of for instance, the environment, the worker and the citizens of a given state at large(Bertland, 2008). Tax evasion, illegal release of untreated wastes to a water source for example, is termed unethical practices. Therefore, the virtue ethics compel a manager to ensure that their firms do not practice such behaviors. Further, it is up to the managers to be accountable for every activity carried out by their firm. They are thus responsible for any mistakes that might occur because of their businesses. Similarly, they are responsible for any positive result posted by the firm in terms of ethics (Fairchild, 2010). The virtue ethics does not only shape individual behavior but also shapes decision-making. Contingency plans that are put up by managers must also still consider the ethical code of conduct. Therefore, there is no doubt that the virtue ethics immensely influences any managers way of handling duties and responsibilities. The Effect of the Virtue Ethics Theory on Ethical Culture Ethical culture aims at encouraging individuals and groups to respect nature and others as humans in order to develop a better world. Virtue ethics advocate for admirable behaviors that bring about social harmony (Erll et al, 2008). These moral virtues make people act according to reason. In line with the virtue ethics theory, morally virtuous individuals engage proper reasoning and their actions are moderated rather than done with extremism (Ciurria, 2011). This should have been the case for the Apple management, knowing well that terrorism is a threat harmonious co-existence. The virtue ethics theory also emphasizes that moral virtues enable individuals to have the correct intention and to feel appropriate while carrying out various activities. Good intentions towards others cultivate respect for humanity and advocates for peace, unity, and collaboration. In conclusion, therefore the virtue ethics theory can be said to advocate for moral virtues, which involve behaviors that are moderated and thus are oriented towards the mean but not extremes. The above discussion brings out the different applications of this theory in the contemporary business world including in the FBI vs. Apple case. It can thus be concluded that the virtue ethics theory remains one of the normative philosophies to be advanced by psychologists and philosophers. References Bertland, A. (2008). Virtue Ethics in Business and the Capabilities Approach. J Bus Ethics, 84(S1), 25-32. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9686-3 Blumenthal-Barby, J. (2015). Dilemmas for the Rarity Thesis in Virtue Ethics and Virtue Epistemology. Philosophia. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11406-015-9670-y Ciurria, M. (2011). A New Mixed View of Virtue Ethics, Based on Daniel Doviaks New Virtue Calculus. Ethic Theory Moral Prac, 15(2), 259-269. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10677-011-9285-8 Crisp, R. (2010). Virtue Ethics and Virtue Epistemology. Metaphilosophy, 41(1-2), 22-40. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01621.x Cuijpers, C. van Schendel, S. (2016). Data Protection by Design als argument in het FBI vs. Apple-debat. Justitile Verkenningen, 42(3), 37-47. https://dx.doi.org/10.5553/jv/016758502016042003004 Engster, D. (2013). The social determinants of health, care ethics and just health care. Contemp Polit Theory, 13(2), 149-167. https://dx.doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2013.14 Erll, A., Grabes, H., Nunning, A. (2008). Ethics in culture. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Fairchild, R. (2010). Practical ethical theory for nurses responding to complexity in care. Nursing Ethics, 17(3), 353-362. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969733010361442 Fernando, M. Moore, G. (2014). MacIntyrean Virtue Ethics in Business: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. J Bus Ethics, 132(1), 185-202. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2313-6 Friedman, M. (2008). Care Ethics and Moral Theory: Review Essay of Virginia Held, The Ethics of Care. Philosophy And Phenomenological Research, 77(2), 539-555. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2008.00205.x Hodson, H. (2016). Apple vs FBI: First salvo in the information war. New Scientist, 229(3062), 24-25. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0262-4079(16)60028-3 Kupperman, J. (2009). Virtue in Virtue Ethics. J Ethics, 13(2-3), 243-255. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10892-009-9051-5 McPherson, D. (2012). Vocational Virtue Ethics: Prospects for a Virtue Ethic Approach to Business. J Bus Ethics, 116(2), 283-296. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1463-7 Moore, G. (2012). The Virtue of Governance, the Governance of Virtue. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 293-318. https://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq201222221 West, A. (2016). After Virtue and Accounting Ethics. J Bus Ethics. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3018-9 Wittmer, D. OBrien, K. (2014). The Virtue of Virtue Ethics in Business and Business Education. Journal Of Business Ethics Education, 11, 261-278. https://dx.doi.org/10.5840/jbee20141113

Euthanasia Authorization Debate

Introduction The debate about euthanasia is becoming broader as a result of the increase in the number of complex ailments. Looking at euthanasia from different perspectives reveals that it is largely an ethical issue. There is a division between those who support the practice and those who oppose it based on voluntary grounds.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Euthanasia Authorization Debate specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The main question that is raised concerning the practice of euthanasia revolves around the effects of legalizing it and its impact on the value of life. This paper takes the position that euthanasia should not be legalized because it goes against the principle of the sacredness of life. Understanding euthanasia McDougall, Gorman and Roberts (2008) define euthanasia as an easy way to terminate the life of a person. According to Chao, Chan and Chan (2002), euthanasia is not merely considered as a n ethical issue in the field of medicine, but it is also a legal, political, and philosophical issue. As observed in the introduction, the debate about euthanasia is expanding because of the nature of the arguments that are given in support and against the practice. One of the arguments, especially from the proponents, is that this practice can be incorporated in the law as a way of eliminating the negative attributes of euthanasia. From the religious perspective, it is apparent that life is sacred and should not be terminated by a human being in any way. Euthanasia, which is equivalent to the termination of life, can be equated to a total breach of the principle of the sacredness of life, as well as the breach of the legal right of human beings’ â€Å"right to life† embedded in most, if not all, common laws. In the true sense, giving the doctors a right to prescribe medication to kill and giving people rights to make a determination of whether to fight for their lives or to terminate life is something to be worried about. From the logical and religious perspectives, this is looked at as murder, on the one hand, and suicide, on the other hand (Cohen-Almagor, 2004). Critical issues in legalizing and justifying euthanasia According to Otlowski (2000), the practice of euthanasia in the field of medicine has been criminalized in many countries as a way of controlling the negative practices of rampant and uncontrolled adoption of the practice. The separation of the two forms of euthanasia has not been fully attained. These dimensions are active euthanasia and passive euthanasia. However, the criminalization of the practice is not enough since it implies that the practice could still be done undercover.Advertising Looking for essay on ethics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Trying to categorize the practice into various dimensions is a way of attempting to legalize the practice, something that co uld result in paving way for the authorization of euthanasia across different countries (Otlowski, 2000). Moreover, legalizing euthanasia could make it hard to differentiate between the genuine cases of suicide and cases of assisted suicide. Most cases of suicide are likely to be hidden under assisted suicide if the practice is made legal (Otlowski, 2000). According to McDougall, Gorman and Roberts (2008), attitudes have continued to play a great role is shaping the advancement of euthanasia in the society. The positive attitudes towards euthanasia need to be suppressed because they imply putting the life of the people in their hands, besides undermining the role of religion in shaping life in the society. The issue here is that doctors can only use the medical expertise to argue that the person cannot survive from the given ailment. However, there are cases in which doctors are overwhelmed by the positive progress that is made by patients considering that the progress goes far beyo nd their assessment of the patients. This is where religion overpowers events in the realms of medicine and healthcare, thus the support of the view that life is sacred and divine. Euthanasia is declared illegal in almost all countries in the world. It is only legalized in one country in the world, the Nethelands. Other countries like Australia, which seem to be interested in legalizing the practice, have been torn between whether to fully incorporate the practice in their common laws or abolish it altogether (Cohen-Almagor, 2004; Chao, Chan Chan, 2002). This itself is a reason enough to raise eyebrows about the ethical stance of the practice. The implication here is that other countries in the world are finding it quite awkward to incorporate euthanasia in their common laws because of the perceived dangers on the value of life if the practice is instituted (Cohen-Almagor, 2004). In spite of the law being enacted in the Netherlands in the year 2001, its enforcement is supervised by a special committee composed of a lawyer, a doctor, and an expert in ethics. Here, it is worthwhile to argue that unlike other laws, there is something wrong with the enactment of the euthanasia law. This is its implementation is being monitored by the special committee. There can be a lot of loopholes when it comes to the implementation of the law. People can take advantage of the law to go against the observance of human rights, yet it is one of the key laws in the common laws of states (Cohen-Almagor, 2004).Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Euthanasia Authorization Debate specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More According to Perrin and McGhee (2006), there is more legal engagement in the debate about end-of- life medical determination across different countries in the world. The rationality of the issue revolves around the level at which euthanasia can be considered effective and eliminate the issue of the sacredness of life and human rights concerns, as well as ethics in the medical field. However, according to Cohen-Almagor (2004), it is clear that it is quite daunting to legalize euthanasia and uphold the sacredness of life, as well as the observation of the key principles of human rights at the same time. The legalization of euthanasia by all means undermines the value of life as instituted in the common laws, as well as most of the religious principles encoded in the religious manuals. Conclusion From the observation made in the paper, it is evident that the debate about the authorization of euthanasia is volatile. However, there are outstanding issues that are raised in the paper that totally point against the authorization of the practice. First is the sacredness of human life as depicted by religion and the common laws of almost all states across the globe. Legalizing euthanasia means infringing the right to life. The second point is that only one country in the world has legalized the practice, yet the same country finds it hard to totally institute the practice. Therefore, it can be concluded that life remains to be the most sacred thing for all human beings. The legalization of euthanasia can pave way for the devaluation of life through the weakening of the law of human rights and the religious principles regarding the divinity and sacredness of human beings and life. References Chao, D., Chan, N., Chan, W. (2002). Euthanasia revisited. Family Practice, 19(2), 128-134. Cohen-Almagor, R. (2004). Euthanasia in the Netherlands: The policy and practice of mercy killing. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. McDougall, J. F., Gorman, M., Roberts, C. S. (2008). Euthanasia: A reference handbook (2nd ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.Advertising Looking for essay on ethics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Otlowski, M. (2000). Voluntary euthanasia and the common law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Perrin, K. O., McGhee, J. (2006). Quick look nursing: Ethics and conflict (2nd ed.). Sudbury, Canada: Jones and Bartlett. This essay on Euthanasia Authorization Debate was written and submitted by user Emily P. to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Partir Conjugation in French, Translation, and Examples

Partir Conjugation in French, Translation, and Examples Partir  is one of the most common French verbs and it means to leave, though it can take on other meanings as well. In order to use partir  in conversations, you will need to learn how to conjugate it. Partir is an irregular verb, so it does not follow the common patterns found in French. Therefore, you will have to memorize it in all its forms. With time you will learn it and, luckily, partir is so common that youll find plenty of opportunities to practice it. Partir  is not all alone in its conjugations, however. Most French verbs ending in  -mir,  -tir, or  -vir  are conjugated the same way. That means that once you learn one, each new verb becomes a little easier.   In this article you will find the conjugations of partir in the present, present progressive, compound past, imperfect, simple future, near future indicative, the conditional, the present subjunctive, as well as the imperative and the gerund. The Many Meanings of  Partir Partir  most commonly means to leave in the general sense of leaving a place. It is the opposite of  arriver  (to arrive). For example, Je vais partir ce soir (Im going to leave tonight) and Il nest pas parti hier (He didnt leave yesterday). Partir  has a few other meanings as well. For example, it can be used to mean to shoot or to fire: Le coup est parti tout seul (The gun went off (fired) by itself) and Le bouchon est parti au plafond (The cork shot up to the ceiling). Partir can also mean to start or to get off to: Tout à §a est bien/mal parti (It got off to a good/bad start) and On est parti sur une mauvaise piste (We got off on the wrong track, to a bad start). Partir  is a semi-auxiliary, meaning that in some cases it can act in the same way as à ªtre or  avoir.  Ã‚  In this instance, when  partir  is combined with an infinitive verb it means to leave in order to do something: Peux-tu partir acheter du pain  ? (Could you go and buy some bread?) and Il est parti à ©tudier en Italie  (He left to study in Italy). As a euphemism, partir  means  to die or to pass away: Mon mari est parti (My husband passed away). Partir  With Prepositions Partir  is intransitive, which means that it cannot be followed by a  direct object. However, it may be followed by a preposition and an indefinite object (e.g., the destination or point/purpose of departure), or by a day, time, or other modifiers: Ils partent de Paris demain. -  Theyre leaving (from) Paris tomorrow.Quand vas-tu partir la chasse  ? -  When are you leaving to go hunting?Il est parti pour luniversità ©.  -  He left for college / went to college.On va partir demain. -  Were going to leave tomorrow. Additionally,  partir  can have different meanings depending on the preposition that follows it. partir    infinitive means  to start (doing something, usually suddenly): As in,  Il est parti pleurer (He started crying, burst into tears) or  Je suis parti rire  (I started laughing, burst into laughter).partir dans   noun means to start (doing something which interrupts something else): As in, Il est parti dans une digression sans fin (He went off into an endless tangent) and Ne pars pas dans une grande colà ¨re (Dont get all mad).partir de  has two meanings:to begin on or to start from: As in, Le contrat partira du 3 aoà »t  (The contract will begin on August 3rd.) and Cest le deuxià ¨me en partant de la gauche (Its the second from the left).to come from: As in, Ça part du cÅ“ur (It comes from the heart) and Doà ¹ part ce bruit  ? (Where is this noise coming from?).partir pour   infinitive also means to start (and gives the impression of continuing for a long time): As in, Il est parti pour parler pendant une heure (He started talking and looked like hed keep going for an hour) and Elle est partie pour nous raconter sa vie (She started telling us her life story). Expressions With  Partir There are a few common French expressions that rely on  partir. For many of these, you will need to conjugate the verb, using what you learn in this lesson. Practicing these in simple sentences will make them easier to remember. partir de  - from (time, date, place) partir de maintenant  - from now on partir de ce moment-l  - from then on partir du moment oà ¹Ã‚  - as soon as vos marques  ! Prà ªts  ? Partez  !  - On your marks! Get set! Go!cest parti  - here we go, here goes Present Indicative The present indicative in French can be translated to English as the simple present tense I leave or as the present progressive Im leaving. Je pars Je pars tout seul. I leave by myself. Tu pars Tu pars de Paris. You leave Paris. Il/Elle/On part Elle part acheter du pain. She leaves to go buy bread. Nous partons Nous partons pied. We leave on foot. Vous partez Vous partez avec vos amis. You leave with your friends. Ils/Elles partent Ils partent au Canada. They leave for Canada. Present Progressive Indicative As mentioned above, the present progressive in French can be expressed with the simple present tense, but it can also be formed with the present tense conjugation of the verb à ªtre (to be) en train de the infinitive verb (partir). Je suis en train de partir Je suisen train de partir tout seul. I am leaving by myself. Tu esen train de partir Tu esen train de partir de Paris. You are leaving Paris. Il/Elle/On esten train de partir Elle esten train de partir acheter du pain. She is leaving to go buy bread. Nous sommesen train de partir Nous sommesen train de partir pied. We are leaving on foot. Vous à ªtesen train de partir Vous à ªtesen train de partir avec vos amis. You are leaving with your friends. Ils/Elles sonten train de partir Ils sonten train de partir au Canada. They are leaving for Canada. Compound Past Indicative Verbs like partir  require  Ãƒ ªtre  when used in compound tenses  like the  passà © composà ©. To construct this past tense, you will need the auxiliary verb  Ãƒ ªtre and the past participle  parti. Notice that when you form the passà © composà © with à ªtre, the past participle must agree in gender and number with the subject. Je suis parti/partie Je suis parti tout seul. I left by myself. Tu es parti/partie Tu es parti de Paris. You left Paris. Il/Elle/On est parti/partie Elle est partie acheter du pain. She left to go buy bread. Nous sommes partis/parties Nous sommes partis pied. We left on foot. Vous à ªtes parti/partis/parties Vous à ªtes partis avec vos amis. You left with your friends. Ils/Elles sont partis/parties Ils sont partis au Canada. They left for Canada. Imperfect Indicative The imperfect tense is another past tense, but it is usually used to talk about ongoing events or repeated actions in the past, and is normally translated to English as was leaving or used to leave. Je partais Je partais tout seul. I used to leave by myself. Tu partais Tu partais de Paris. You used toleave Paris. Il/Elle/On partait Elle partaitacheter du pain. She used to leave to go buy bread. Nous partions Nous partions pied. We used toleave on foot. Vous partiez Vous partiez avec vos amis. You were leavingwith your friends. Ils/Elles partaient Ils partaient au Canada. They were leavingfor Canada. Simple Future Indicative Je partirai Je partirai tout seul. I will leave by myself. Tu partiras Tu partirasde Paris. Youwill leave Paris. Il/Elle/On partira Elle partiraacheter du pain. She willleave to go buy bread. Nous partirons Nous partirons pied. Wewill leave on foot. Vous partirez Vous partirez avec vos amis. Youwill leave with your friends. Ils/Elles partiront Ils partiront au Canada. Theywill leave for Canada. Near Future Indicative The near future in French is formed with the present tense conjugation of the verb aller (to go) the infinitive (partir). It can be translated to English as going to verb. Je vais partir Je vaispartir tout seul. I am going to leave by myself. Tu vaspartir Tu vaspartir de Paris. Youare going to leave Paris. Il/Elle/On vapartir Elle vapartir acheter du pain. She is going toleave to go buy bread. Nous allonspartir Nous allonspartir pied. Weare going toleave on foot. Vous allezpartir Vous allezpartir avec vos amis. Youare going to leave with your friends. Ils/Elles vontpartir Ils vontpartir au Canada. Theyare going to leave for Canada. Conditional To talk about hypothetical or possible events, you can use the conditional mood. Je partirais Je partirais tout seul si je n'avais peur. I would leave by myself if I were not scared. Tu partirais Tu partiraisde Paris si tu pouvais. Youwould leave Paris if you could. Il/Elle/On partirait Elle partirait acheter du pain si elle avais d'argent. She wouldleave to go buy bread if she had money. Nous partirions Nous partirions pied si ce n'à ©tait pas loin. Wewould leave on foot if it were not far. Vous partiriez Vous partiriez avec vos amis, mais vos amis ne peuvent pas aller. Youwould leave with your friends, but your friends can't go. Ils/Elles partiraient Ils partiraient au Canada s'ils voulaient. Theywould leave for Canada if they wanted to. Present Subjunctive The subjunctive mood is used in situations when the action of leaving is uncertain. Que je parte Mon pà ¨re suggà ¨re que je parte tout seul. My father suggests that I leave by myself. Que tu partes Le juge exige que tu partes de Paris. The judge demands that you leave Paris. Qu'il/Elle/On parte Le patron conseille qu'elle parte acheter du pain. The boss advises that she leave to go buy bread. Que nous partions Charles souhaite que nous partions pied. Charles wishes that we leave on foot. Que vous partiez Jacques prà ©fà ¨re que vous partiez avec vos amis. Jacques prefers that you leave with your friends. Qu'ils/Elles partent Le prà ©sident souhaite qu'ils partent au Canada. The president wishes that they leave for Canada. Imperative When you want to say something like Leave! you can use the imperative verb mood. In this case, theres no need to include the subject pronoun, so simply say, Pars ! Also, to form the negative commands, just place ne...pas around the positive command. Positive commands Tu pars ! Pars de Paris ! Leave Paris! Nous partons! Partons pied ! Let's leave on foot! Vous partez! Partez avec vos amis ! Leave with your friends! Negative commands Tu ne pars pas ! Ne pars pas de Paris ! Don't leave Paris! Nous ne partons pas! Ne partons pas pied ! Let's not leave on foot! Vous ne partez pas ! Ne partez pas avec vos amis ! Don't leave with your friends! Present Participle/Gerund The  present participle  of  partir  is  partant. This was formed by adding the ending  -ant  to the verb stem. One of the uses of the present participle is to form the gerund (usually preceded by the preposition en), which is often used to talk about simultaneous actions. Present participle/gerund ofPartir partant Je pleure en partant Paris. I cry while leaving Paris.

Speed management proposal Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Speed management proposal - Essay Example A general agreement that exists is that injuries on the roads increase because of speed and so objectives of safety and mobility can be conflicting. Globally, over speeding is one hell of a predicament to control in our roadways and is an immense contributor to most of the accidents witnessed both in rural and urban areas by traffic officials and residents. It is a belief by many individuals that eradication of speeding will save people’s lives by driving at a speed that is appropriate (Ioainnoou, 1997, pg 216). A road accident is considered related to over speeding if the driver is charged with an offense of over speeding. Additionally, if a traffic officer who is on the location indicates that the driver at some point was over speeding past the required speed limit when the accident occurred then it became over speeding-related. Road accidents related to over speeding have led to many deaths worldwide and, as a result, the community, and insurance firms have incurred excessi ve costs. Accidents or crash are more likely to happen the faster a driver drives and the higher the risk of getting injuries that are brutal and even loss of life. Accidents and speed relate to another due to a number of dependent factors. For instance, how severe the injury of the occupants of the vehicle involved in a crash is not only determined by the speed that resulted in the collision but also the difference in mass of the two involved vehicles.